Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Drury's avatar

Excellent analysis as usual, Ryan.

A factor in this that is unspoken in many circles is that many of those who attend the largest denominational churches do not KNOW they are going to a church that is a part of a denomination. Those mega-churches with a denominational allegiance typically go to great lengths to obscure, bury, or never-mention-unless-asked their denominational alignment. Some of them will copy over the doctrinal statements of their denom onto their web page but rarely link over to it for fear that all these really desiring a "non" experience will be driven away. I some cases they don't want the internet trolls to "hold them responsible" for the views of the denomination either (you can imagine some of those.)

So, my thesis is that a meaningful chunk of those who identify as that 13% are actually attending a church from a denomination but they don't know it, and the leaders of that church don't want them to know it.

I say all this as someone who served as denominational headquarters chief-of-staff for 9 years where I saw this dynamic at play in our largest churches (and a majority of our new growing church plants as well). In our case we didn't really try to dislodge this approach at all, for a variety of reasons. But more on that another time.

Expand full comment
George Bullard's avatar

My personal life observation -- not scientific research -- is that denominations defined and bounded their structural and programmatic identity during the Boomer generation birth period of 1946 to 1964. A few denominations finished up their institutionalization in the mid to late 1960s. However, by the 1960s the growth of styles of churches which were non-denominational began gaining strength. Then by the late 1970s and early 1980s -- symbolized by churches such as Willow Creek and Saddleback -- the non-denominational movement gained a significant crescendo. Denominations were not serving the innovation of new styles of congregations, so parachurch organizations began doing this. Then by the mid-1980s the decline of denominations ,that also started as far back as the mid-1950s in the mainline denominations, caused social science researchers to begin talking about a post-denominational era. I, myself, promoted a denominational transformation era as I felt denominations could adapt. But they could not adapt to the extent necessary so both the parchurch movement and the non-denominational movement gained momentum that denominations could not adequately respond to in a positive manner. Denominations "balkanized" through developing hard boundaries around who was truly part of their movement and who was not. Centered-set, non-denominational churches grew in number exponentially. Now it is too late for denominations without a radical "come to Jesus" scale of change. It is highly doubtful, however, that denominations are willing to make the changes necessary. Thus, we are truly in a non-denominational era and will not go back to what was.

Expand full comment
28 more comments...

No posts