I have taught Christians in Scandinavia since 1986. Attendance in the State Churches is almost zero. I preached once at a chapel next to the famous ski center, packed with men and women from the slopes. The churches operated as 'Prayer Houses' are usually better attended. Most citizens have at least a BS, but the educational setup is so different from ours that any comparison is difficult. Most of my friends have a graduate-level education. I helped one seminary make changes to fit the American model.
Your background is really interesting. I think every sentence in your comment is something you could expand upon to offer some interesting insights here.
That was a fascinating response but not too surprising for several reasons. Religion that has forced religious education without any kind of faith in God has little if any true understanding of the meaning of why anyone would be interested in its practice. The Church Council is elected by the entire community of voters and atheists often run to stop or deemphasize all traditional Christian activities. Christianity often operates as a far left political party.
My maternal grandmother had a young and foolish marriage in the Sweden of 1915, which is why I have a brood of Swedish half cousins. The American Swedes had been out of touch with the Swedish Swedes for forty years when an enterprising young cousin decided to try to find them. That was in 1993. She was successful, and in the next few years, several of us went to visit them.
When an aunt and uncle went to visit in 1996, my aunt told her oldest half niece that she wanted to see the church where her mother had been baptized. When my half cousin told this to the one brother in a family composed otherwise of sisters, his reaction was, "Why would she want to do that?"
Thanks for looking it up. As I said, that explanation was tongue in cheek. In truth, as you point out, no one gets Sunday off anymore. It used to be a big thing. Everything was quieter on Sundays. All the stores were closed. Workers got double time for Sundays and holidays. Good luck even finding an open pharmacy. When I visited New England power dispatch (REMVEC), one of the older guys reminisced about the Sunday power usage lull and then the late morning after church surge when everyone would turn on their oven to roast a chicken.
Nowadays, Sunday is just another day. Low end workers are scheduled by managers or machines that don't worry about the Ten Commandments. Upper end workers simply work 24/7. That seven includes Sunday. Some years back I looked at worker hours from the BLS and a few other sources. Low end workers actually work shorter weeks than they used to, probably thanks to more "efficient" scheduling. High end workers report longer hours. My guess it was exempt (salaried) versus non-exempt (hourly) rules.
P.S. I lived in a state noted for its "blue laws" banning Sunday activity. I was always surprised to find so many stores open on Sundays when I visited what we would now call red states. Now, we're all purple on that score.a
I'm 58 and I don't recall a time when "all the stores" closed on Sunday. I do recall when most things didn't open until noon and closed early, c. 5pm or 6pm. And in Michigan where I grew up liquor sales were forbidden on Sunday (beer and wine were OK-- but only after noon)
There are still plenty of 40hr/week jobs in the US with weekends off-- I've mostly had those kinds of jobs after college.
Where I grew up nothing except the most necessary businesses (hospitals; hotels; gas stations...) were open on Christmas. In 2003 I moved to Florida and was shocked to see a strip club with a full parking lot on Christmas Eve.
There are definitely LOTS of 40 hour, five weekdays, eight hours each jobs out there. It's just that there are a lot more jobs with rotating schedules that have people working Sundays. I remember a friend of mine in retail overjoyed at getting a Saturday shift because that meant double pay.
I'm 74. I grew up in New York City and moved to the Boston area. Honest, Sundays were really quiet. Supermarkets, drug stores, hobby shops, wine and liquor stores, department stores and the like were closed all day Sunday. There were some convenience stores open and you could buy gas but not get an oil change. We did our shopping on Saturday. I remember needing a lemon on a Sunday and going from convenience store to convenience store in the suburbs until I found one on sale.
In the 1980s, Massachusetts started allowing stores to open on Sunday afternoons. If you were in, let's pick a state I'm familiar with, Virginia, most of those stores were open on Sundays all day. The northeast was slower to get rid of its blue laws.
Still, there's been a lot of change towards longer opening hours. I remember wandering New York City on Thanksgiving Day and the only stores we saw open were bakeries and then only for bespoke pies. Even the Duane Reades we passed were closed. That was a while back.
When you stop and think about who in Europe has no formal education -- it's immigrants, right? So my first thought is that Muslim/African immigration is driving this effect.
Couple this with observations that in much of Europe, there are more people going to a mosque each week than going to a Christian church service, and I think that's your answer. Though some of the immigrants (primarily those from Africa) could be going to Christian services also.
Native Euro church attendance is so low that it's possible for immigrants to show up in the numbers to a much greater degree than in the US.
I do want to point out, though, that the data here seem to show correlation, not causation. So it seems that the post title, which refers to education’s “impact on church attendance,” overstates the post/is not reflective of the data presented. (Let me know if there was causal evidence and I just missed it!)
It would be cool to see these trends for other regions as well, e.g. Latin America!
I'm wondering similarly. For some reason I've had questions about religiosity's relationship to a society's sophistication on my mind over the last few years. Especially given the growing significance of Christian Nationalism here.
I'd be very interested in seeing this data in comparison of rural and metro populations too.
Education is very correlated with growing up middle class and absorbing that value system. If the middle class is religious, the educated are more religious too.
Regarding the false perception of the relationship between religiosity and educational attainment in America, I suspect there’s some sort of availability bias driving the perception. There’s simply many more non-college grads (and many, many more non-postgrads) that you’re simply unlikely gto run into many PhDs to inquire about their religious beliefs, unless you’re a demographer.
I’d also note that in absolute terms it’s pretty shallow slope. It’s not no-relationship, but nor is it exponential or even a steep linear. Depending on the uncertainty bounds, I could reasonably interpret this as “a bit under a third of people are weekly churchgoers, irrespective of their educational level” and I don’t think you can untangle that without getting into causal analysis, which you are (fairly reasonably) unwilling to do.
That said, it’s fascinating that the trend is flipped in Europe. Definitely more to explore in this area
Great points. I noted my interest in looking elsewhere in the equation. Many European countries went through the Industrial Revolution before America. Now were embarking in the Fourth Industrial Age...
“Among Christians, the pattern of educated people being more involved in their religious communities makes sense. As I’ve written before, https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/03/religiously-unaffiliated-white-americans/518340/ communal involvement of all kinds is increasingly becoming a luxury good of sorts, with higher levels of income and education making people more likely to participate in activities like church, book club, parent-teacher association, and more. It could be that high-school-educated Christians feel less able to find and connect with a religious community in a broader context of financial strain, family stress, and geographic isolation. Or it could be that college-educated Christians put more of a premium on connecting with their brothers and sisters in the church.”
In almost all European countries, there is more support than in the US for those less well-off (and the cost of health care is part of that). The effect of lower income would thus be moderated in Europe. Is that at least a correct, partial explanation for the differences between US and European religious attendance and levels of education? (If Medicaid is gutted, then there may be some relevant data to be collected.)
In European countries, there is no legal “wall of separation” between church and state affecting public education. Though the current SCOTUS is lowering the height of that wall, that wall has been fairly high during the last 50 years or so in the US. That seems to me to be less likely to be a factor than financial strain and its effects on perceived available time, however.
Good point. The economic structure of neo-liberalism vs. social democracy in causing financial strain, family stress, and marginality among the less educated profoundly affects church attendance and participation in voluntary associations in the United States.
As a Catholic….is it poor/less educated Catholics driving this? The downward trend lines in Europe are from predominantly Catholic countries. In America, the flattest trend lines are from the more heavily Catholic Northeast, and the upward trend lines are from notably protestant Kansas and Utah. I feel like Catholicism is probably more equally income distributed than, say, Anglicanism or being Dutch Reform. Idk about Evangelicals; there’s a poor hick stereotype there but 🤷🏻♀️
Yeah, I would be really interested in exploring this relationship further, to the extent that it exists.
I kind of wonder if Catholic theology and worship are more compatible with the worldviews of the lower class on some qualitative level, and if the converse holds for Protestantism. Impossible to say for sure, it's probably multi-causal, the trend may not even really hold when you look more closely at the numbers, and boiling things down to "The Reformation's notion of priesthood of all believers and its concommitant (moderate) de-insitututionalization of religion forced a realignment of religiosity along class lines of the secular world" feels a bit simplistic, but I can't help but to feel that's that's a strong possibility.
It's also amusing because you could definitely characterize the same causal dynamic in a way that's more or less flattering to either Protestants or Catholics, but I digress.
Charles Taylor talks about religion at different “speeds” and I think Catholicism is for sure more multi-speed compared to Protestantism. In particular, much of Protestantism is very reading-the-Bible-focused, which I think is a barrier for some people.
As a side note - a friend who’s in-the-know about the Episcopal Church in the USA, said that new rectors would prefer not to be assigned to the NorthEast as these areas have a lackluster interest in religion & community; the would prefer southern assignments.
Thought here: Non-EU immigrants tend to be overrepresented in both the “no formal education” and the “postgrad” buckets. Of course this doesn’t explain why the European church is wildly unsuccessful at keeping most of their educated native population engaged.
In Australia, more educated people are more likely to attend church and more likely to be No Religion in the census. The less educated are more likely to be nominal Christians.
If you break down by age, the difference is starker because the older ages have more church attenders and the younger ones have more educated people.
Do you think this is a significant reason for the difference in income inequality between Europe and the US? Church attendance is one of the best avenues for developing social capital (including economic connectedness) that the less educated can access. The educated have much more avenues. Do you think the boon of social capital building church attendance primarily of the less educated in Europe is what is driving the more reduced gaps in Europe in comparison to the US?
The more you write about this, the more I wonder how much sabbath has to do with all this…do people with better access to the weekend use it for church?
Empirically I'm not seeing any evidence of this, even if a part of me really thinks we should have extensive Blue Laws.
The actual mechanism seems to be kind of the opposite: America's freewheeling entrepreneurial culture leads to lots of people working on the weekend but also lots of options for churches that are adapted to a variety of preferences and hence higher church attendance than other rich countries.
Thomas, I live in a Caribbean territory of the Netherlands, and have spent a lot of time in the European part of the Netherlands, also. Weekends are a real thing, like you note. On my island, hotels and a couple of restaurants are open on Sunday--but nothing else. Devout atheist? Devout Catholic? Doesn't matter, no one's going to insult you by asking you to come in to work on Sunday.
Thanks, I read your piece, I enjoy the perspective.
I (and my family) abide by a personal sabbath on Sundays, in which we abstain from commerce (among other things), aside from occasional emergencies (e.g. we messed up and the baby is out of diapers). I try to preach Sabbath-keeping to people around me, so I don't want to downplay the Sabbath. It's important for human flourishing, I believe, and even more important for family flourishing.
It's frustrating that I actually live in one of the more religious parts of America and yet more and more stuff seems to get scheduled on Sundays. Travel sports, in particular, are now a major topic that every family has to come down on, and they threaten to consume our Sundays.
I'm mainly just skeptical of the claim that there is a large class of people that don't go to church because they might, at least sometimes, have to work on Sundays. Maybe there are a few people on the margin like this, but I don't think it explains much at the macro level. For one, America's diversity of choice means that there are plenty of Sunday evening services around for this exact reason.
But for another, in a culture without a social expectation of attending church (as in the case of every culture in the West these days), it's a self-motivated decision. People who want to go to church find a way to go to church. People who don't want to go to church just don't go to church. Blue laws as a church attendance booster make more sense in the context of a society with at least some social expectation of attending church.
Totally agree. If weekly church attendance were important to one, one would find a way to make that happen, regardless of work schedule. Even on my island where everyone has Sunday off, there are weeknight church services. This is even more so in the United States. I'm totally willing to buy the idea that there are people who *say* "oh I can't go to church because I have to work weekends," but I think that almost all of these people would still not go to church in an America with blue laws.
And thanks for reading and trying to hold on to a Sabbath. It's so hard when the culture is all-hustle all the time.
Churches, particularly in the suburbs, have become the new, tax deductible country club. Most of my youth was spent traveling around America as a military brat. After a career 40 plus years in Asia, I came back to see old friends in places I'd lived at before and was surprised at how much middle and upper middle class area churches had become community centers with gyms, swimming facilities, dance halls, etc. etc. On the other hand, the churches, particularly the catholic churches in lower class areas had lost/given up a lot of their recreational related facilities and were pared back. Maybe that has some impact?
Setting aside the fact that this is all correlation, it's not clear to me which direction the causation should go here. Does education cause religiosity, or is it the reverse? For instance, flipping the axes here, more religious people in the United States tend to get more education while in Europe more religious people tend to get less education. Not sure what it means, though.
I suspect that in an educational lens, perhaps not all churches are created equal. The EU+UK countries that are predominantly Lutheran and Anglican appear to not have the drop-off that many (traditionally) Catholic countries do.
That correlation is more difficult to see in the U.S., where other faith traditions have a larger market share.
I have taught Christians in Scandinavia since 1986. Attendance in the State Churches is almost zero. I preached once at a chapel next to the famous ski center, packed with men and women from the slopes. The churches operated as 'Prayer Houses' are usually better attended. Most citizens have at least a BS, but the educational setup is so different from ours that any comparison is difficult. Most of my friends have a graduate-level education. I helped one seminary make changes to fit the American model.
Stay in touch and I will attempt to share my experiences. Unless we travel and teach internationally we can’t understand.
Your background is really interesting. I think every sentence in your comment is something you could expand upon to offer some interesting insights here.
That was a fascinating response but not too surprising for several reasons. Religion that has forced religious education without any kind of faith in God has little if any true understanding of the meaning of why anyone would be interested in its practice. The Church Council is elected by the entire community of voters and atheists often run to stop or deemphasize all traditional Christian activities. Christianity often operates as a far left political party.
My maternal grandmother had a young and foolish marriage in the Sweden of 1915, which is why I have a brood of Swedish half cousins. The American Swedes had been out of touch with the Swedish Swedes for forty years when an enterprising young cousin decided to try to find them. That was in 1993. She was successful, and in the next few years, several of us went to visit them.
When an aunt and uncle went to visit in 1996, my aunt told her oldest half niece that she wanted to see the church where her mother had been baptized. When my half cousin told this to the one brother in a family composed otherwise of sisters, his reaction was, "Why would she want to do that?"
I'll offer a tongue in cheek explanation. In the US, low education workers are less likely to get Sunday off.
According to to the BLS:
29.7% of people with only a high school diploma work on the weekend.
It's 26.9% of people with a bachelor's degree.
https://www.bls.gov/charts/american-time-use/emp-by-ftpt-job-edu-p.htm
Thanks for looking it up. As I said, that explanation was tongue in cheek. In truth, as you point out, no one gets Sunday off anymore. It used to be a big thing. Everything was quieter on Sundays. All the stores were closed. Workers got double time for Sundays and holidays. Good luck even finding an open pharmacy. When I visited New England power dispatch (REMVEC), one of the older guys reminisced about the Sunday power usage lull and then the late morning after church surge when everyone would turn on their oven to roast a chicken.
Nowadays, Sunday is just another day. Low end workers are scheduled by managers or machines that don't worry about the Ten Commandments. Upper end workers simply work 24/7. That seven includes Sunday. Some years back I looked at worker hours from the BLS and a few other sources. Low end workers actually work shorter weeks than they used to, probably thanks to more "efficient" scheduling. High end workers report longer hours. My guess it was exempt (salaried) versus non-exempt (hourly) rules.
P.S. I lived in a state noted for its "blue laws" banning Sunday activity. I was always surprised to find so many stores open on Sundays when I visited what we would now call red states. Now, we're all purple on that score.a
I'm 58 and I don't recall a time when "all the stores" closed on Sunday. I do recall when most things didn't open until noon and closed early, c. 5pm or 6pm. And in Michigan where I grew up liquor sales were forbidden on Sunday (beer and wine were OK-- but only after noon)
There are still plenty of 40hr/week jobs in the US with weekends off-- I've mostly had those kinds of jobs after college.
Where I grew up nothing except the most necessary businesses (hospitals; hotels; gas stations...) were open on Christmas. In 2003 I moved to Florida and was shocked to see a strip club with a full parking lot on Christmas Eve.
There are definitely LOTS of 40 hour, five weekdays, eight hours each jobs out there. It's just that there are a lot more jobs with rotating schedules that have people working Sundays. I remember a friend of mine in retail overjoyed at getting a Saturday shift because that meant double pay.
I'm 74. I grew up in New York City and moved to the Boston area. Honest, Sundays were really quiet. Supermarkets, drug stores, hobby shops, wine and liquor stores, department stores and the like were closed all day Sunday. There were some convenience stores open and you could buy gas but not get an oil change. We did our shopping on Saturday. I remember needing a lemon on a Sunday and going from convenience store to convenience store in the suburbs until I found one on sale.
In the 1980s, Massachusetts started allowing stores to open on Sunday afternoons. If you were in, let's pick a state I'm familiar with, Virginia, most of those stores were open on Sundays all day. The northeast was slower to get rid of its blue laws.
Still, there's been a lot of change towards longer opening hours. I remember wandering New York City on Thanksgiving Day and the only stores we saw open were bakeries and then only for bespoke pies. Even the Duane Reades we passed were closed. That was a while back.
There is some truth to this in my experience.
When you stop and think about who in Europe has no formal education -- it's immigrants, right? So my first thought is that Muslim/African immigration is driving this effect.
Couple this with observations that in much of Europe, there are more people going to a mosque each week than going to a Christian church service, and I think that's your answer. Though some of the immigrants (primarily those from Africa) could be going to Christian services also.
Native Euro church attendance is so low that it's possible for immigrants to show up in the numbers to a much greater degree than in the US.
Graph 1 here: https://www.graphsaboutreligion.com/p/how-religious-is-europe
Good question. Would be interesting to see a breakdown by religious tradition in Europe, maybe for a future post.
Thanks for this post—interesting data!
I do want to point out, though, that the data here seem to show correlation, not causation. So it seems that the post title, which refers to education’s “impact on church attendance,” overstates the post/is not reflective of the data presented. (Let me know if there was causal evidence and I just missed it!)
It would be cool to see these trends for other regions as well, e.g. Latin America!
I'm wondering similarly. For some reason I've had questions about religiosity's relationship to a society's sophistication on my mind over the last few years. Especially given the growing significance of Christian Nationalism here.
I'd be very interested in seeing this data in comparison of rural and metro populations too.
RE: growing significance of Christian Nationalism here.
Not sure Christian Nationalism is actually Christian...sure isn't Jesus's "way." Seems to me more like "Reactionary" Nationalism.
.
Education is very correlated with growing up middle class and absorbing that value system. If the middle class is religious, the educated are more religious too.
Regarding the false perception of the relationship between religiosity and educational attainment in America, I suspect there’s some sort of availability bias driving the perception. There’s simply many more non-college grads (and many, many more non-postgrads) that you’re simply unlikely gto run into many PhDs to inquire about their religious beliefs, unless you’re a demographer.
I’d also note that in absolute terms it’s pretty shallow slope. It’s not no-relationship, but nor is it exponential or even a steep linear. Depending on the uncertainty bounds, I could reasonably interpret this as “a bit under a third of people are weekly churchgoers, irrespective of their educational level” and I don’t think you can untangle that without getting into causal analysis, which you are (fairly reasonably) unwilling to do.
That said, it’s fascinating that the trend is flipped in Europe. Definitely more to explore in this area
Great points. I noted my interest in looking elsewhere in the equation. Many European countries went through the Industrial Revolution before America. Now were embarking in the Fourth Industrial Age...
"... model with controls like age, income, and gender." What was the effect of the control for income?
Emma Green, “Why Educated Christians are Sticking with Church,” Atlantic Monthly, 4/26/2017. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/04/education-church-attendance/524346/ wrote:
“Among Christians, the pattern of educated people being more involved in their religious communities makes sense. As I’ve written before, https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/03/religiously-unaffiliated-white-americans/518340/ communal involvement of all kinds is increasingly becoming a luxury good of sorts, with higher levels of income and education making people more likely to participate in activities like church, book club, parent-teacher association, and more. It could be that high-school-educated Christians feel less able to find and connect with a religious community in a broader context of financial strain, family stress, and geographic isolation. Or it could be that college-educated Christians put more of a premium on connecting with their brothers and sisters in the church.”
In almost all European countries, there is more support than in the US for those less well-off (and the cost of health care is part of that). The effect of lower income would thus be moderated in Europe. Is that at least a correct, partial explanation for the differences between US and European religious attendance and levels of education? (If Medicaid is gutted, then there may be some relevant data to be collected.)
In European countries, there is no legal “wall of separation” between church and state affecting public education. Though the current SCOTUS is lowering the height of that wall, that wall has been fairly high during the last 50 years or so in the US. That seems to me to be less likely to be a factor than financial strain and its effects on perceived available time, however.
Good point. The economic structure of neo-liberalism vs. social democracy in causing financial strain, family stress, and marginality among the less educated profoundly affects church attendance and participation in voluntary associations in the United States.
As a Catholic….is it poor/less educated Catholics driving this? The downward trend lines in Europe are from predominantly Catholic countries. In America, the flattest trend lines are from the more heavily Catholic Northeast, and the upward trend lines are from notably protestant Kansas and Utah. I feel like Catholicism is probably more equally income distributed than, say, Anglicanism or being Dutch Reform. Idk about Evangelicals; there’s a poor hick stereotype there but 🤷🏻♀️
Yeah, I would be really interested in exploring this relationship further, to the extent that it exists.
I kind of wonder if Catholic theology and worship are more compatible with the worldviews of the lower class on some qualitative level, and if the converse holds for Protestantism. Impossible to say for sure, it's probably multi-causal, the trend may not even really hold when you look more closely at the numbers, and boiling things down to "The Reformation's notion of priesthood of all believers and its concommitant (moderate) de-insitututionalization of religion forced a realignment of religiosity along class lines of the secular world" feels a bit simplistic, but I can't help but to feel that's that's a strong possibility.
It's also amusing because you could definitely characterize the same causal dynamic in a way that's more or less flattering to either Protestants or Catholics, but I digress.
Charles Taylor talks about religion at different “speeds” and I think Catholicism is for sure more multi-speed compared to Protestantism. In particular, much of Protestantism is very reading-the-Bible-focused, which I think is a barrier for some people.
As a side note - a friend who’s in-the-know about the Episcopal Church in the USA, said that new rectors would prefer not to be assigned to the NorthEast as these areas have a lackluster interest in religion & community; the would prefer southern assignments.
Thought here: Non-EU immigrants tend to be overrepresented in both the “no formal education” and the “postgrad” buckets. Of course this doesn’t explain why the European church is wildly unsuccessful at keeping most of their educated native population engaged.
Forced, state-run education is not seen as a source of dynamic change or eternal message. It is religious algebra not rebirth.
In Australia, more educated people are more likely to attend church and more likely to be No Religion in the census. The less educated are more likely to be nominal Christians.
If you break down by age, the difference is starker because the older ages have more church attenders and the younger ones have more educated people.
Do you think this is a significant reason for the difference in income inequality between Europe and the US? Church attendance is one of the best avenues for developing social capital (including economic connectedness) that the less educated can access. The educated have much more avenues. Do you think the boon of social capital building church attendance primarily of the less educated in Europe is what is driving the more reduced gaps in Europe in comparison to the US?
We need to get you to Europe! Surprised you have never been. No curiosity to see where your ancestors are from?
The more you write about this, the more I wonder how much sabbath has to do with all this…do people with better access to the weekend use it for church?
Empirically I'm not seeing any evidence of this, even if a part of me really thinks we should have extensive Blue Laws.
The actual mechanism seems to be kind of the opposite: America's freewheeling entrepreneurial culture leads to lots of people working on the weekend but also lots of options for churches that are adapted to a variety of preferences and hence higher church attendance than other rich countries.
Thomas, I live in a Caribbean territory of the Netherlands, and have spent a lot of time in the European part of the Netherlands, also. Weekends are a real thing, like you note. On my island, hotels and a couple of restaurants are open on Sunday--but nothing else. Devout atheist? Devout Catholic? Doesn't matter, no one's going to insult you by asking you to come in to work on Sunday.
If you'll indulge me, I wrote about Sundays and my shared opinion with you that blue laws (or at least a culture that takes codified time off seriously) are good things: https://doctrixperiwinkle.substack.com/p/and-keep-it-holy
Thanks, I read your piece, I enjoy the perspective.
I (and my family) abide by a personal sabbath on Sundays, in which we abstain from commerce (among other things), aside from occasional emergencies (e.g. we messed up and the baby is out of diapers). I try to preach Sabbath-keeping to people around me, so I don't want to downplay the Sabbath. It's important for human flourishing, I believe, and even more important for family flourishing.
It's frustrating that I actually live in one of the more religious parts of America and yet more and more stuff seems to get scheduled on Sundays. Travel sports, in particular, are now a major topic that every family has to come down on, and they threaten to consume our Sundays.
I'm mainly just skeptical of the claim that there is a large class of people that don't go to church because they might, at least sometimes, have to work on Sundays. Maybe there are a few people on the margin like this, but I don't think it explains much at the macro level. For one, America's diversity of choice means that there are plenty of Sunday evening services around for this exact reason.
But for another, in a culture without a social expectation of attending church (as in the case of every culture in the West these days), it's a self-motivated decision. People who want to go to church find a way to go to church. People who don't want to go to church just don't go to church. Blue laws as a church attendance booster make more sense in the context of a society with at least some social expectation of attending church.
Totally agree. If weekly church attendance were important to one, one would find a way to make that happen, regardless of work schedule. Even on my island where everyone has Sunday off, there are weeknight church services. This is even more so in the United States. I'm totally willing to buy the idea that there are people who *say* "oh I can't go to church because I have to work weekends," but I think that almost all of these people would still not go to church in an America with blue laws.
And thanks for reading and trying to hold on to a Sabbath. It's so hard when the culture is all-hustle all the time.
Churches, particularly in the suburbs, have become the new, tax deductible country club. Most of my youth was spent traveling around America as a military brat. After a career 40 plus years in Asia, I came back to see old friends in places I'd lived at before and was surprised at how much middle and upper middle class area churches had become community centers with gyms, swimming facilities, dance halls, etc. etc. On the other hand, the churches, particularly the catholic churches in lower class areas had lost/given up a lot of their recreational related facilities and were pared back. Maybe that has some impact?
Setting aside the fact that this is all correlation, it's not clear to me which direction the causation should go here. Does education cause religiosity, or is it the reverse? For instance, flipping the axes here, more religious people in the United States tend to get more education while in Europe more religious people tend to get less education. Not sure what it means, though.
Did anyone else notice the anomaly Montana presents?
I suspect that in an educational lens, perhaps not all churches are created equal. The EU+UK countries that are predominantly Lutheran and Anglican appear to not have the drop-off that many (traditionally) Catholic countries do.
That correlation is more difficult to see in the U.S., where other faith traditions have a larger market share.