Thanks, Ryan. Your research, and especially your graphs, are so informative. The way you show us the data always helps me to see things more clearly - especially regarding faith and politics.
Ryan, you might have spoken to this in your book, but is there a gender skew among the "None" labels? My guess would be that atheists skew more male while nothing-in-particulars skew more female.
If that's true, then seeing as how they are positioned to the left of a Democratic Party that skews female, it would seem that male atheists are pretty far out of step politically compared to men their age more generally.
Thanks, Ryan. Your research, and especially your graphs, are so informative. The way you show us the data always helps me to see things more clearly - especially regarding faith and politics.
Ryan, you might have spoken to this in your book, but is there a gender skew among the "None" labels? My guess would be that atheists skew more male while nothing-in-particulars skew more female.
If that's true, then seeing as how they are positioned to the left of a Democratic Party that skews female, it would seem that male atheists are pretty far out of step politically compared to men their age more generally.
Yeah - it's something I touch about in The Nones.
Atheists are the most male-dominated 'religious' group. Agnostics a bit less so.
Nothing in particulars are evenly split.