Discussion about this post

User's avatar
EagerFrog's avatar

At least for the Catholic clergy respondents, it’s worth noting that the most “strident” response does not necessarily reflect the Catholic Church’s authoritative teaching, or the statements may be ambiguous because they’re not written in theological language. For example, on the Biblical question that you highlight, a Catholic could likely affirm both (2) and (3) based on completely orthodox doctrine, e.g., regarding the New Covenant.

Miranda Hassett's avatar

So, there's always room to wonder about the space between survey response and what's actually going on in somebody's heart and mind, but I think that's particularly important here with respect to evangelical pastors and their very strong "fully believe, no doubts" responses, which in your closing remarks you seem to take at face value. Evangelical epistemology leans really really hard on certainty, and on a whole edifice of truth that has to all hang together. There's not a lot of space for acknowledging doubt in that world (until and unless it becomes unmanageable and things come crashing down). I'm not the right person to say something coherent about this - but there's a substantial sociological literature on the subject; it shouldn't be hard to find. In addition to having studied some of that along the way, I've also worked with my fair share of ex-evangelicals on their way into (or through) the Episcopal Church over the years. People can have deep, deep questions and dissatisfactions, while living in the evangelical world, and just never feel safe enough to surface or name them, often even to themselves. So taking these pastors' responses as Gospel truth, so to speak, rather than what evangelicals have to say when questioned about their faith, seems like something worth a little pushback to me. Thanks for all this interesting work!!

14 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?