Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Alex Bass's avatar

Thanks Ryan. Always look forward to reading your LDS posts.

My personal take on your high LDS engagement is teaching on being a "peculiar" people. LDS people are taught to be "in the world not of the world" and be "peculiar." I think religion is often a large part of an LDS identity (since it is a high demand religion) and LDS want to see how their "peculiarity" plays out in the data.

I particularly enjoyed the moderate-only analysis which I feel paints a good picture of LDS politics the last few elections. I'm excited to see how the LDS youngest cohort plays out in future elections.

Cheers!

Expand full comment
Russell Arben Fox's avatar

This is excellent work, Ryan; thank you! Two points: 1) To me, the most relevant piece of data was the expansion of self-identifying “moderates” among LDS voters who otherwise consider themselves (and presumably have a history of voting as) Democrats, Independents, and Republicans. The tiny “liberal” segment remains essentially unchanged across the partisan board, but the number of historical Mormon Democrats and Independents who consider themselves “conservative” is where you’ve seen the real drop. It’s a version of the same ideology-to-party sorting that’s been taking place among voters generally for a couple of generations; it’s nice to see data that is able to put numbers to that trend among American Mormons as well. 2) Why do you hear more from Mormons than from Muslims, Buddhists, etc.? I would guess it's because American Mormons (speaking as one myself) tend to punch above our weight, politically speaking--look at the comparatively unrepresentatively large LDS presence in Congress, for example--and so we have a large cohort of folks already oriented to see ourselves in national studies, forgetting that we're actually a really tiny minority.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts